Internet privacy pro argument4/28/2023 ![]() If employers are stopping people from saying what they want to during an email, then they are taking away that right, some people believe. ![]() According to the first amendment, everyone has the right to freedom of speech. Clearly, a set policy as well as laws, are needed so that no one's first amendment rights are being violated in any way. Usually, employee monitoring can be limited to a record of the email traffic and the subject of those emails, without actually having to read the contents (Loney, 2002).īecause email and Internet have not been around for a long time in the grand scheme of things, the rules on what a person can and cannot do are still being created. The most important thing for a company to do is to set out clear policies for Web and Email usage and let employees know up front whether they will be monitored so that there will not be any confusion in the future. Under normal circumstances, though, it is not thought to be acceptable in that country. The story states that covert monitoring may be acceptable in special circumstances, such as when a crime is thought to be being committed, but it is a bit of a gray area and therefore is open for interpretation as to what it acceptable monitoring and what is not. The argument could go either way as to whether it is an invasion of privacy or a necessary evil, but looking at the issue from all angles is certainly important.Īccording to a relatively recent British news story, it is illegal to monitor employee's email and Internet usage without telling them that you are going to be doing do. This is making some employees very nervous, but does it violate their rights? Some believe it does, and others see it as necessary for the proper functioning of business. While some employers are much more concerned than others, and therefore monitor their employees' activities more closely, all employers have the option to monitor their employees where the Internet is concerned. TOPIC: Thesis on Internet Privacy AssignmentEver since the Internet and email began to be widely used in the business world, employers have been monitoring their employees' email messages and what kinds of Websites they have been visiting on company time. They seem to labor under the misguided belief that their work email addresses and business computers are personal property, which is not seen by many employers to be the case. When their employer looks to see where they have been or checks their emails to see what they have been doing, the employees react as though they are the offended parties. Paper NOW! ⬇️ Personal feelings have shaped the way I feel because too many employees seem to think that the Internet is there at work for them to play with. ![]() The tested theory is that, overall, this thesis holds true and most companies that offer their employees the Internet at work or require them to use the Internet or email for business do not give them any expectation of privacy. The main thesis for this paper is that employees in a workplace do not enjoy Internet privacy while they are at work and that they should not expect it as a basic right. Should employees ask about this when they are hired or only assume that they have no right to privacy on the Internet at work unless told otherwise? Additional questions that will help with the research are:ĭo most workplaces offer their employees Internet privacy?ĭo companies that do not offer Internet privacy have a requirement to tell their employees? The primary purpose of this paper is to explore the issue, argue a claim, and analyze a theory. Is Internet privacy a right in the workplace or only a privilege? The focusing question on Internet privacy is this: The main issue that will be addressed here is whether Internet privacy is appropriate in the sense that it can and should be used to control or regulate what is done in the workplace.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |